Home : Employment Law : Workers' Compensation : Jury Verdicts

Workers' Compensation - Jury Verdicts

______ $400,000 plus reduction of workers' compensation lien. - Worksite Accident Worksite Accident - Electric Line Left In Parking Lot - Premises Liability - Electricity - Settlement
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a security guard by a third party. She was working as a contract security guard at defendant company's plant when she stepped on a live 480 volt line that had been left inadvertently in the parking lot by defendant.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant was negligent in leaving the live line in the parking lot and that she suffered post-traumatic st...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (123222) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ $68,000 - Assault & Battery Assault & Battery - Workplace - Previous Threats - Intentional Tort
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a steelworker by Defendant LTV Steel Corporation. A co-worker frequently came in late for work, requiring that plaintiff stay until he arrived. Pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement, the worker who has to stay when another worker is late receives the late worker's pay. After the co-worker was late for the 15th time, plaintiff kept the co-worker's p...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (123160) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ $600,000 - Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice - Unnecessary Surgery - Wrong Mri - Settlement
Facts: Plaintiff injured his back at work, aggravating a preexisting condition. His physician ordered an MRI. The MRI showed a back injury at T4-T5. Plaintiff then was referred to defendant orthopedic surgeons, who asked for a copy of the MRI from defendant radiology center. Defendant surgeons were erroneously sent the MRI of a person with a name similar to plaintiff's. The MRI sent to the ...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (122513) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ Verdict for plaintiff. The jury overturned the ruling of the W.C. Commission; plaintiff is eligible to participate in benefits. - Workers' Compensation Workers' Compensation - Work-related Injury
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a laborer by Defendant Xavier University. He was allegedly injured within the course and in the scope of his employment. Several years thereafter plaintiff was diagnosed with a herniated disc at L4-L5, which required surgery. The Worker's Compensation Commission denied plaintiff's claim for benefits, and plaintiff appealed that decision.

Plaint...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (122015) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ Defense verdict. The jury found no proximate cause and affirmed the Worker's Compensation Board in denying benefits to plaintiff. - Workers' Compensation Workers' Compensation - Work-related Injury - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a laborer by Defendant KDM Signs, Inc. He allegedly injured his back while lifting a 200 pound silk screen.

Plaintiff alleged that he suffered lumbar disc protrusion at L4-L5 in the course and within the scope of his employment and, therefore, he was entitled to participate in the Workers' Compensation Fund. The Board denied benefits and plai...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (122028) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ $1,600,000 plus reduction in workers' compensation lien. - Products Liability Products Liability - Fire Tanker - Brakes/wiring Of Safety Lights - Amputation - Settlement
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a firefighter. A fellow firefighter was operating a fire tanker designed and manufactured by defendants. While the vehicle appeared to be in neutral, it moved forward, striking plaintiff. Plaintiff suffered a dislocated hip and underwent above the knee amputation of his leg.

Plaintiff alleged that defendants were negligent in providing a fir...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (123239) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ Defense verdict. The jury reversed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission and denied benefits to the plaintiff for his bulging disc injuries. - Workers' Compensation Workers' Compensation Appeal - Work-related Injury - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a laborer by Defendant General Motors Corporation. He fell at work, suffering lumbosacral strain. The Workers' Compensation Commission allowed benefits for a central bulging disc at L5-S1 and a very mild bulging disc at L4-L5. Defendant appealed the Commission's decision.

Plaintiff alleged that all of his injuries were proximately related to...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (120936) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ Defense verdict. The jury affirmed the order of the Workers' Compensation Commission which disallowed plaintiff's claim for benefits for psychological injury. - Workers' Compensation Workers' Compensation Appeal - Work-related Injury - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as an assembler by Defendant Louisiana Pacific Corporation. In 1978 she sustained a low back injury in the course and scope of her employment. Plaintiff filed a claim for workers' compensation and subsequently had the claim amended at various stages to include injury to various other body parts. The Workers' Compensation Commission denied a claim for psychol...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (121196) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ The jury upheld the Commision's finding that the plaintiff is eligible to participate in Worker's Compensation Fund for benefits relating only to her lumbosacral herniation injury. - Workers' Compensation Workers' Compensation Appeal - Work-related Injury - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff, a 45 year old woman, was employed as a laborer by Defendant Crocker Fels Company. She sustained a herniated lumbar disc at L5-S1 within the scope and in the course of her employment. Plaintiff underwent surgery, but continued to complain of pain and weakness in her left leg. She ultimately fell down a flight of stairs at home due to leg weakness. Plaintiff sustained two he...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (121689) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
______ Defense verdict. The jury reversed the decision of the Commission, finding that plaintiff did not suffer a compensable injury. - Workers' Compensation Workers' Compensation Appeal - Work-related Injury - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a laborer by Defendant Action Labor. He allegedly injured his back on March 13, 1992 while handling steel pipes for defendant at Witt Steel. The Workers' Compensation Commission found that plaintiff suffered a compensable injury in the course and within the scope of his employment. Defendant employer appealed the Commission's decision to this jury trial.
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (121807) Login for Workers' Compensation Verdict
Want to contact a Washington, DC Workers' Compensation attorney? ...Get a free case evaluation from one of our Washington, DC Workers' Compensation attorneys now.

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.

Pages:   1   2   3   4   5   6   ...   Next

Need A Workers' Compensation Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Were your rights violated?

Please Describe the Injury

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Want to contact a Washington, DC Workers' Compensation attorney? ...Get a free case evaluation from one of our Washington, DC Workers' Compensation attorneys now.

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Workers' Compensation Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Workers' Compensation case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Employment Law: Workers' Compensation Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.
This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.